Frank Figliuzzi

Frank Figliuzzi

FEATURE COLUMNS

Why the DOJ's Antifa Terrorism Convictions Threaten the First Amendment

The slippery slope toward labeling any president's opponents as organized terrorists

Frank Figliuzzi's avatar
Frank Figliuzzi
Mar 18, 2026
∙ Paid

U.S. Department of Justice prosecutors performed a magic trick on Friday in a federal courtroom in Fort Worth, Texas. Before the jury’s eyes, they transformed a group of young protesters who were present when shots were fired last summer at an immigration building, into a domestic terrorist organization that DOJ insisted on calling “Antifa”. Eight of the nine defendants were convicted on charges of material support to terrorism – the first successful use of such charges against the nebulous cloud of Antifa that the Trump administration has confabulated into an ominous threat. The use of a statute, historically used to prosecute members of carefully designated international terrorist groups against an ill-defined, broad hodge-podge of politically left of center American activists – even those who engage in clearly criminal conduct, puts us on a slippery slope toward labeling any president’s ideological opponents as organized terrorists.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Frank Figliuzzi.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Frank Figliuzzi · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture